<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Preference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morgajel.net/2005/09/27/6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morgajel.net/2005/09/27/6/</link>
	<description>Stemming the flow of evincible Ignorance. We must try to understand for the sake of understanding.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Morgan</title>
		<link>http://morgajel.net/2005/09/27/6/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgajel.net/?p=6#comment-11</guid>
		<description>shedao, I mention them because I've had situations where either a) I've had to fix someone elses mess(check the wayback machine for seadent.com) or I've had management ask why it was taking so long to create an intranet when he could whip up a page in frontpage in 20 minutes.

You know it's crap, I know it's crap, but they don't know, nor do they care. but it gives them the illusion of simplicity, and that's where the problem is with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shedao, I mention them because I&#8217;ve had situations where either a) I&#8217;ve had to fix someone elses mess(check the wayback machine for seadent.com) or I&#8217;ve had management ask why it was taking so long to create an intranet when he could whip up a page in frontpage in 20 minutes.</p>
<p>You know it&#8217;s crap, I know it&#8217;s crap, but they don&#8217;t know, nor do they care. but it gives them the illusion of simplicity, and that&#8217;s where the problem is with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shedao</title>
		<link>http://morgajel.net/2005/09/27/6/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>shedao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgajel.net/?p=6#comment-10</guid>
		<description>You commies are all alike. Talking up the commie water. Drinking the commie kool-aid!

Mandrake! Get over here and feed me this belt of ammo!


I think that what you said is true about 3rd world and linux. But not about MS products and newbs using them. There are just as many cluster fuck apps written on linux or mac. Access is a piece of shit, FP is a joke. But VB, although I dislike using it, is powerful enough to write probably 95% of everything you need on windows. If you do it wrong, well that's your dumb ass fault. But it's that sense of ease that get's people into trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You commies are all alike. Talking up the commie water. Drinking the commie kool-aid!</p>
<p>Mandrake! Get over here and feed me this belt of ammo!</p>
<p>I think that what you said is true about 3rd world and linux. But not about MS products and newbs using them. There are just as many cluster fuck apps written on linux or mac. Access is a piece of shit, FP is a joke. But VB, although I dislike using it, is powerful enough to write probably 95% of everything you need on windows. If you do it wrong, well that&#8217;s your dumb ass fault. But it&#8217;s that sense of ease that get&#8217;s people into trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Morgan</title>
		<link>http://morgajel.net/2005/09/27/6/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgajel.net/?p=6#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Yup, not to mention the rumors that have been going around for *years* about the NSA/FBI/CIA/SS/DHS making microsoft put in back doors for them.  If the source isn't open to them, how can they check?  

This was actually a big concern what, 5 years ago?  They actually let the chinese gov't see their source code to prove they weren't misbehaving- or parts of it at least.

Now, true or untrue, it's still a concern.  suppose, from their point of view, they go to war with the US and MS really HAS put some sort of auto-locking kill switch in there. Imagine if their infrastructure was locked in the middle of a war?  Bad news for the guy who gets it run on their machines.  Now, if say this country was to find out about the switch, and use it against the US?  would the US know it's there?  some branch somewhere would, but as we've seen in the past, the US gov't isn't exactly good at communicating with itself. Then we get pwned with our own software.

But that's a very slim possibility.  I thought I was going somewhere with this.

Ah, yes.  lets not forget about winXP activation.  it would suck to be at war and not be able to re-activate your software when you decide to upgrade.

*continues to mumble*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, not to mention the rumors that have been going around for *years* about the NSA/FBI/CIA/SS/DHS making microsoft put in back doors for them.  If the source isn&#8217;t open to them, how can they check?  </p>
<p>This was actually a big concern what, 5 years ago?  They actually let the chinese gov&#8217;t see their source code to prove they weren&#8217;t misbehaving- or parts of it at least.</p>
<p>Now, true or untrue, it&#8217;s still a concern.  suppose, from their point of view, they go to war with the US and MS really HAS put some sort of auto-locking kill switch in there. Imagine if their infrastructure was locked in the middle of a war?  Bad news for the guy who gets it run on their machines.  Now, if say this country was to find out about the switch, and use it against the US?  would the US know it&#8217;s there?  some branch somewhere would, but as we&#8217;ve seen in the past, the US gov&#8217;t isn&#8217;t exactly good at communicating with itself. Then we get pwned with our own software.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s a very slim possibility.  I thought I was going somewhere with this.</p>
<p>Ah, yes.  lets not forget about winXP activation.  it would suck to be at war and not be able to re-activate your software when you decide to upgrade.</p>
<p>*continues to mumble*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VP&#124;bofh</title>
		<link>http://morgajel.net/2005/09/27/6/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>VP&#124;bofh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgajel.net/?p=6#comment-7</guid>
		<description>It is not just financial, these governments have a valid concern about being locked out from their own content. Imagine the Republic of Morgajel not being able to update the  master copy of their constitution because the Microsoft sales rep is too slow returning calls to order the yearly (mandatory) upgrade for "MS Office: Small Country Edition," which auto shuts down after using it for one year. To them this is more scary than the $400/computer licenses.

This scares Microsoft because they like to be the only game in town, and it is hard to sell bulk licensing when the software itself does not have an incremental cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not just financial, these governments have a valid concern about being locked out from their own content. Imagine the Republic of Morgajel not being able to update the  master copy of their constitution because the Microsoft sales rep is too slow returning calls to order the yearly (mandatory) upgrade for &#8220;MS Office: Small Country Edition,&#8221; which auto shuts down after using it for one year. To them this is more scary than the $400/computer licenses.</p>
<p>This scares Microsoft because they like to be the only game in town, and it is hard to sell bulk licensing when the software itself does not have an incremental cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
